| Baptism According to Acts 2:38 |
|
|
|
| Kuki People - Religion | |||||||
|
Monday, 17 November 2008 21:06
|
|||||||
|
By Paogin Mangte Acts 2:38 is the most controversial baptism verse in the Bible. Trinitarians hate it and have fought hard to either pervert the wording of it or the meaning of the words. The issue is two things: the name to be invoked over the convert, and if baptism by faith in water is essential to salvation. Baptism was not invented by man and not a work instituted by man (John 1:33--"he that sent me to baptize"). Therefore it is from God. What was God's purpose in baptism is the issue here. If the purpose was to demonstrate one's faith in Messieh and the finished work of Calvary and the Resurrection how can men deny its holiness and essentiality? Only through this act of faith a person is risen with Christ. A person is not risen with Christ until they are baptized by faith. Baptism is essential as an act of faith and is a requirement for salvation (Mark 16:16-"he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved"). Acts 2:38 is Peter's obedience to the command of Christ in Luke 24:47-49.  We cannot discount Peter's preaching on the grounds additional Scripture to be written 25 years later might be manipulated to prove Peter was wrong. Acts 2:38 was the only baptismal formula used by the Church. There is no trinitarian formula ever used.  In fact the Hebrew Matthew Hebrew now discovered does not contain the trinitarian clause at all proving as scholars say it was added to the text and Bible in the second century. Upon close examination we will see that water baptism in Romans chapter 6 does teach baptismal regeneration. When trinitarians are defeated in the formula to be used they next want to say that baptism is not essential in faith salvation and attack the concept of regeneration. But Romans 6 leaves us with no escape: those baptized into the death of Christ are raised, regenerated, in the likeness of his resurrection. If this is not true, then it is not essential to be buried with Christ in baptism and it is not essential to be raised in the likeness of his resurrection. So, baptismal regeneration is a Biblical truth? Let's look at Titus 3:5: "Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost." Regeneration: Greek paliggenesia Strongs #3824--rebirth (born again), from #3825 palin=anew, once more and #1078 genesis=birth, nativity. The second birth, called being born of the Spirit (John 3:8); born again (1Peter 1:23); born of God (1John 3:9, 4:7, 5:1, 5:4). Regeneration here is the same as re-birth or born anew or again as found in John 3:3-5. Now where is there a washing of rebirth except in the waters of baptism as found in Romans 6:4-5? Does a person receive this washing of regeneration and resurrection by saying I accept Jesus into my heart? No! Do they receive it by saying I accept the Lord Jesus as my personal Savior? No! Where is washing by the blood of Jesus by which he saves us, in the same place as renewing in the Holy Ghost? It is found exclusively in Acts 2:38 and not grouped in any other single text in the New Testament. In one text we have both, and Paul writing to Titus says this is how he saved us. Therefore, this washing of regeneration is not works of man or Paul contradicted himself. Faith is not works of man.  Faith is works of the Word of God. For faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God (Romans 10:17). Acts 2:38 stands uncondemned in spite of the many attacks by trinitarians to destroy its message and meaning. Can a doctrine be made from one verse in the Bible?  Yes! There are many things mentioned one time in the Word of God and these are just as valid for doctrine as things mentioned many times. The Holy Ghost, the author of the Bible, does not need to speak twice for something to be true. The Holy Ghost spoke through Peter in Acts 2:38. Those words were not Peter's words. Why do so many always resist the Holy Ghost?  Is Acts 2:38 the only verse we have for baptism in the name of Jesus only? No, we have many text such as in Acts 8:12, Acts 10:48, Acts 19:5. And there are other text that indicate baptism into Christ and him alone for it is his death into which we are baptized (Romans 6:4-5). Then there is the text in Ephesians 4:5 of one Lord, one Faith, and one Baptism. We have plenty of verses to validate baptism into the name of Jesus Christ.  Acts 2:38 is the pole-star of the Apostolic baptismal mode and method as practiced by the Apostles. Now it must be understood that Acts 2:38 teaches salvation by grace through faith. Without this understanding a person can wrestle this verse unto their own destruction. Repentance that is commanded in this text is an act of faith and the grace of forgiveness is given. Water baptism that is commanded is an act of faith and the grace of remission of sins is given. Holy Spirit baptism is commanded as a receiving by faith, and the grace of the gift of eternal life is given. There is complete and full salvation by grace through faith in the obedience of Apostle Peter's preaching. Note: Anyone who teaches water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ is not essential to salvation is preaching a false doctrine. Anyone who teaches water baptism according to Acts 2:38 is a work of man and is not of faith is teaching a false doctrine. Anyone who teaches that in Romans 6 that baptismal regeneration is not taught is teaching a false doctrine. Why follow after the cunning devises of men.  Why not take the Apostle Peter's words unto your own heart as if you were there on the day of Pentecost. What was the intent of the Apostle Peter in this text? Why do men pervert his intent? They asked the Apostles: "men and brethren what shall we do?" Why do men pervert the words of Peter in answer to this important question? They wanted to know what to do to be saved. Things Peter did not say: Peter did not say Calvary plus nothing; Trinitarians have spread the lies that if you follow the Apostle Peter in Acts 2:38 it will hurt you.  Some how you will be added to a cult instead of the Church. That some how you will become demon possessed and deceived. Don't be afraid to think outside the trinitarian box. Get out of the box.  Don't let men deceive you so easily. Take the Word of God because it is Holy Spirit inspired. The Apostle Peter was speaking by the Holy Ghost when he commanded the multitude of Jews to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Any man who claims Peter was not speaking by the Holy Ghost is a devil.  If Peter was speaking by the Holy Ghost, what was the intent of the Holy Ghost for those who heard the first Gospel message? The intent of the Holy Ghost was for people to be saved! If there is no blood of Christ applied in water baptism, then remission of sins by and during water baptism is a joke Jesus and the Apostle Peter pulled on 3,000 believing Jews. It was no joke. It is for real. Now come to these waters of the blood covenant. Come to these waters of blood purification. Come to these waters of the crossing from death unto life. Come today, Come right now. Do not delay. It is you soul you must bring from darkness to light by the way of New Testament salvation found in Acts 2:38. May the Lord Jesus himself reveal unto you his glorious grace in Acts 2:38 water baptism! The author is the founding Pastor of India-based Oneness Pentecostal Christian Church Inc. (Independent Oneness Biblical Church).
Set as favorite
Hits: 2023 Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
![]()
kukiforumid
said:
|
|
... Easy to publish difficult to digest! A laymen is confused Please let the word of God be not made so complex that laymen like me wonders! I just believe in Jesus. |
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|